Libel: Time for a bigger frame?
By Claire de Than, senior lecturer, City University London
Blogroll
-
Recent Posts
- The papers
- Reframing Libel: A Practitioner’s Perspective
- The proposed restriction on corporate bodies to sue for defamation
- Reframing the costs of libel
- What needs to happen from the media’s perspective
- Reforming libel law: evolution, not revolution
- Science and libel
- Reframing Libel: The online perspective
- Reframing libel: Taking (all) rights seriously and where it leads
- Libel: Time for a bigger frame?
- Changing the experience of being sued and the impact on science and medical research
- Reframing the time it takes to get to a libel trial
- The government’s draft defamation bill
- Video from the Reframing Libel Symposium
- Mullis and Scott propose two stream libel regime, with only most unusual cases going to High Court
- The three Cs of changing libel: Costs, Citizen critics and Corporations
- Reframing libel: costs, corporations and citizen critics
- Follow the Reframing Libel Symposium live
- The Reframing Libel symposium programme
- BBC College of Journalism to film Reframing Libel event
- Reserve your ticket for the Reframing Libel symposium – 4th November 2010
- Mark Stephens: Lord Lester’s bill will be ‘killed’
- Lord Lester speaks out on defamation bill ahead of Lib Dem conference
- What is the Reframing Libel Symposium?
- Welcome to the Reframing Libel Symposium
Archives
Comments
4 Responses to “Libel: Time for a bigger frame?”Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying...[...] Claire de Than: Time for a bigger time frame? [...]
[...] Claire de Than: Time for a bigger time frame? [...]
[...] Claire de Than: Time for a bigger time frame? [...]
[...] Claire de Than: Time for a bigger time frame? [...]