Latest news on the bill…- Publication: Library Note 2010/016 June 23, 2011Defamation Bill [HL]: Library Note 2010/016
- Publication: Library Note 2010/016 June 23, 2011
The papers
To coincide with the publication of the government’s draft defamation bill, the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism is making papers from the Reframing Libel conference available online. View them at these links:
- Peter Wilmshurst: Changing the experience of being sued and the impact on science and medical research
- Claire de Than: Time for a bigger time frame?
- Alastair Mullis and Andrew Scott: Reframing libel – Taking (all) rights seriously and where it leads
- Robert Dougans: Reframing Libel: The online perspective
- Andrew Stephenson: Science and libel
- Gavin Sutter: Reforming libel – evolution, not revolution
- Roy Greenslade: What needs to happen from the media’s perspective
- Razi Mireskandari: Reframing the costs of libel
- Magnus Boyd: The proposed restriction on corporate bodies to sue for libel
- Hugh Tomlinson: A practitioner’s perspective
Reframing Libel: A Practitioner’s Perspective
By Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Chambers
The proposed restriction on corporate bodies to sue for defamation
By Magnus Boyd, partner, Carter-Ruck
Reframing the costs of libel
By Razi Mireskandari, partner, Simons Muirhead & Burton
What needs to happen from the media’s perspective
By Professor Roy Greenslade, City University London
Reforming libel law: evolution, not revolution
By Gavin Sutter, lecturer in media law, Queen Mary University
Science and libel
By Andrew Stephenson, senior partner, Carter Ruck
Reframing Libel: The online perspective
By Robert Dougans, associate, Bryan Cave
Reframing libel: Taking (all) rights seriously and where it leads
By Professor Alastair Mullis, University of East Anglia and Dr Andrew Scott, London School of Economics
Libel: Time for a bigger frame?
By Claire de Than, senior lecturer, City University London
